Evaluating the Effectiveness of United Nations Peace-Building Strategies in South Sudan

Kelly Otieno Opiyo

doi:10.51867/AQSSR.1.3.5

Authors

Kelly Otieno Opiyo Masinde Muliro University of Science and Technology, Kenya Author https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5488-3425

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51867/AQSSR.1.3.5

Keywords:

Conflict Management, Demobilization, Disarmament, Economic Reforms, Ex-Combatants, Peace-Building Programs, Prevention Mechanisms, Reintegration, Security Sector Reform

Abstract

This article evaluates the effectiveness of United Nations peace-building programs in South Sudan. The study aimed to identify the main United Nations peace-building strategies, determine how local perceptions impact United Nations peace-building strategies, and illustrate the effectiveness of United Nations peace-building strategies in supporting sustainable peace in South Sudan. The study borrows from liberal institutionalism and conflict transformation theory. The theories explain the collaborative approach to addressing the root causes of conflict in South Sudan. The study employed a mixed-methods design, utilizing descriptive statistics including SSP version 28 for quantitative data and thematic excerpt evaluation for qualitative data. This enabled the study to explore the effectiveness of various peace-building strategies, gaps, and interventions. It targeted military peacekeepers, including troops, staff officers, military observers (MILOBs), and police, including both UN police and GOSS local police, accumulating to 3280. A sample size of 354 was determined by the Yamane’s formula, and participants were sampled through cluster sampling, convenience sampling, and purposive sampling. Primary data collection methods included questionnaires, focus group discussions (FDGs), and interview schedules. Secondary data was collected through a review of various publications. Specifically, it highlights the impact of DDR and SSR programs and other economic reforms as conflict management and prevention mechanisms. The findings show that the mission in South Sudan has provided essential support during and post-conflict, improving local and national coping mechanisms. Despite challenges in funding, coordination, and sustainability, the mission has significantly impacted peace-building efforts. Recommendations include enhancing resources, integrating third-party donors, and focusing on mental, physical, and vocational well-being. Additionally, follow-up interventions for ex-combatants will boost sustainability. Strengthening conflict resolution, protecting civilians, and fostering inclusive dialogue will help UNMISS achieve lasting peace in South Sudan.

References

Alao, A. (2017). Local perceptions and the effectiveness of United Nations peacebuilding strategies. Journal of Peace Research, 54(3), 421-436.

Ansorg, N., & Gordon, E. (Eds.). (2020). Co-operation, contestation and complexity in peacebuilding: Post-conflict security sector reform. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003120582 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003120582

Baker, J., Asiimwe, G., & Matysiwicz, B. (2023). Outcome evaluation of UNMISS contribution to strengthening the rule of law and accountability in South Sudan. OIOS. https://oios.un.org/file/9904/download?token=o-VwEVgO

Bellamy, A. J., & Williams, P. D. (2011). The new politics of protection? Côte d'Ivoire, Libya and the responsibility to protect. International Affairs, 87(4), 825-850. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2346.2011.01006.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2346.2011.01006.x

Belloni, R. (2012). The role of evaluation in security sector reform. International Peacekeeping, 19(1), 112-129.

Beny, L. N. (2015). United Nations Security Council Resolution 2206 on targeted sanctions in South Sudan. International Legal Materials, 54(5), 945-954. https://doi.org/10.5305/intelegamate.54.5.0945 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5305/intelegamate.54.5.0945

Cilliers, J., & Mills, G. (1999). Collective security in a new era: The case for an African security architecture. Aldershot, England: Ashgate.

Day, A., Hunt, C. T., Yin, H., & Kumalo, L. (2019). Assessing the effectiveness of the UN Mission in South Sudan (UNMISS). EPON Report.

Donais, T., & Solomon, A. (2022). Protection through peacebuilding in South Sudan. African Security Review, 31(1), 51-65.

https://doi.org/10.1080/10246029.2021.1968916 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10246029.2021.1968916

In Transformative Initiative (ITI). (2021). The South Sudan initiative supporting the national dialogue process. https://www.intransformation.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/South-Sudan-case-study-Proof-1.pdf

Jones, J., & Smith, J. (2017). Ethnography: Challenges and opportunities. Evidence-Based Nursing, 20(4), ebnurs-2017-102786. https://doi.org/10.1136/eb-2017-102786 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/eb-2017-102786

Keohane, R., & Nye, J. (1977). Power and Interdependence: World politics in Transition. Little Brown.

Kumalo, L., & Roddy-Mullineaux, C. (2019). Sustaining peace: Harnessing the power of South Sudanese women. ISS East Africa Report, 2019(30), 1-16.

Lamb, G., & Stainer, T. (2018). The conundrum of DDR coordination: The case of South Sudan. Stability: International Journal of Security & Development, 7(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.5334/sta.628 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/sta.628

Lederach, J. P. (1997). Sustainable reconciliation in divided societies. Washington, DC: USIP.

Louangrath, P. I., & Sutanapong, C. (2019). Minimum sample size calculation using cumulative distribution function. International Journal of Research & Methodology in Social Science, 5(1), 100-113.

Mugenda, O. M., & Mugenda, A. G. (1999). Research methods: Quantitative and qualitative approaches. Nairobi: African Centre for Technology Studies.

Merry, S. E. (2006). Anthropology and international law. Annual Review of Anthropology, 35, 99-116. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.35.081705.123245 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.35.081705.123245

Nascimento, M. C. (2018). The United Nations Mission in South Sudan (UNMISS) and security sector reform (SSR). International Studies Quarterly, 62(2), 532-545.

Nyadera, P. A. (2018). The United Nations Mission in South Sudan (UNMISS) and the challenges of peacebuilding. Journal of Peacebuilding & Development, 12(1), 3-28. https://iecah.org/en/the-unmis-in-south-sudan-challenges-a-dilemmas/.

Pahrenholz, T. (Ed.). (2010). Civil society & peacebuilding: A critical assessment (pp. 43-64). Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781685856878 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781685856878

Samuel, M. (2023, May 15). UNMISS and UNDP hold peace dialogue for communities from Ayod and Fangak. https://unmiss.unmissions.org/unmiss-undp-hold-peace-dialogue-communities-ayod-and-fangak

Shapiro, M., & Lampert, A. (2014). International law and institutions. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

Sedra, M. (2011). Security sector reform monitor: Southern Sudan. The Centre for International Governance Innovation. https://www.cigionline.org/sites/default/files/ssrm_southern_sudan_v4_0.pdf

Smith, J. (2017). The impact of armed conflict on humanitarian crises: A case study of South Sudan. International Journal of Peace Studies, 32(1), 67-82.

Smith, G. (2021). Overcoming barriers to coordinating across social protection and humanitarian assistance: Building on promising practices. Policy paper. June. Social Protection Approaches to COVID-19: Expert advice (SPACE).

Spink, L. (2020). Protection through dialogue: How UNMISS is linking local engagement with a national peace process in South Sudan. T CIVIC. https://civiliansinconflict.org/publications/policy/protection-through-dialogue-unmiss/#:~:text=UNMISS's%20work%20is%20intended%20to,revitalized%20peace%20agreement%20in%202018.

South Sudan Monitor. (2011). UNMISS: A second chance for UN peacekeeping in South Sudan. https://www.saferworld-global.org/downloadfile.php?filepath=downloads/pubdocs/SSMAug2011.pdf

United Nations Security Council (UNSR). (2021, May 28). Resolution 2577 (2021). https://documents.un.org/doc/undoc/gen/n21/135/85/pdf/n2113585.pdf?token=QtTTY1Uzfkv8P12MKG&fe=true

United Nations (UN). (2017, May 2024). The latest national dialogue in South Sudan will only work with the genuine participation of opposition groups, a senior official tells the Security Council. United Nations. https://press.un.org/en/2017/sc12840.doc.htm

United Nations (UN). (2022, January 28). Report of the Secretary-General on peacebuilding in the immediate aftermath of conflict.

UNDP. (2021). DDR commission engages and sensitizes SSPDF leadership on disarmament, demobilization, and reintegration. https://www.undp.org/south-sudan/press-releases/ddr-commission-engages-and-sensitizes-sspdf-leadership-disarmament-demobilization-and-reintegration

Van der Lid, J. (2023). No exit, without an entry strategy: Transitioning UNMISS SSR activities. SIPRI Research Policy Paper. https://www.sipri.org/sites/default/files/2023-03/no_exit_without_an_entry_strategy.pdf

https://doi.org/10.55163/UCJZ6119, https://doi.org/10.55163/OTJM8878 DOI: https://doi.org/10.55163/UCJZ6119

Zehr, H., & Mika, H. (2017). Fundamental concepts of restorative justice. In Restorative justice (pp. 73-81). Routledge.

https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351150125-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351150125-4

Yamane, T. (1967). Statistics: An introductory analysis (2nd Ed.). New York: Harper and Row.