Labour rights and corporate accountability in Zambia: Evidence from corporate governance practices
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51867/AQSSR.3.1.17Keywords:
Accountability, Corporate Governance, Due Diligence, Enforcement, Informality, Labour RightsAbstract
This study examined the extent to which labour rights are integrated into corporate governance and business practices in Zambia, with particular attention paid to how organisational policy commitments translate into operational accountability. Guided by stakeholder theory and accountability theory, the study conceptualised labour rights as a core governance obligation rather than a discretionary corporate social responsibility function. The research was motivated by persistent labour rights violations in high-risk sectors, such as mining, agriculture, construction, and manufacturing, despite the existence of national labour legislation and international human rights frameworks. A convergent mixed-methods research design was employed. The target population consisted of employees and managers in medium-to-large enterprises operating within the identified sectors, as well as labour inspectors, trade union representatives, civil society actors, and government officials involved in labour governance. Quantitative data were collected through structured questionnaires administered to 336 employees and managers, selected using stratified random sampling based on sectoral representation. Qualitative data was generated from 32 purposefully selected key informants to capture institutional, regulatory, and experiential perspectives on labour rights enforcement. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation, and logistic regression in SPSS to assess the relationship between governance mechanisms and labour rights violations. Qualitative interview data was thematically analysed using NVivo, following an inductive coding approach. The findings revealed that only a minority of firms fully integrate labour rights into governance structures, with most demonstrating minimal to moderate integration. Qualitative results highlighted systemic challenges, including informal employment practices, weak enforcement capacity, limited rights awareness, a fear of retaliation, ineffective grievance mechanisms, and limited board-level oversight of labour issues. The study concludes that enforcement deficits and reliance on voluntary accountability frameworks, not policy gaps, drive labour rights failures in Zambia. It recommends mandatory human rights due diligence, strengthened labour inspection capacity, accessible grievance and remedy mechanisms, and the formalisation of employment relationships to enhance corporate accountability.
References
Abe, O. (2022). The state of business and human rights in Africa. Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung Ethiopia Office. https://library.fes.de/pdf-files/bueros/fes-ua/19589-20221107.pdf
Abuhadba, A. (2022). Voluntary corporate social responsibility initiatives versus contracts through the context of the Bangladesh Accord, the Fair Food Program (FFP), and the Worker Rights Consortium (WRC). Rutgers International Law & Human Rights Journal, 3, 99-129.
Adekola, J., & Clelland, D. (2020). Two sides of the same coin: Business resilience and community resilience. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 28(1), 50-60. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5973.12275 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5973.12275
Adom, D., Hussein, E. K., & Agyem, J. A. (2018). Theoretical and conceptual framework: Mandatory ingredients of quality research. International Journal of Scientific Research, 7(1), 438-441.
Aluchna, M., & Roszkowska-Menkes, M. (2019). Integrating corporate social responsibility and corporate governance at the company level: Towards a conceptual model. Inzinerine Ekonomika-Engineering Economics, 30(3), 349-361. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.ee.30.3.17511 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.ee.30.3.17511
Amnesty International. (2023). Amnesty International report 2022/23: The state of the world's human rights - Zambia. https://www.amnesty.org/en/location/africa/southern-africa/zambia/report-zambia/
Backer, L. C. (2020). Business and human rights: A handbook for legal practitioners. Oxford University Press.
Banerjee, S. B. (2008). Corporate social responsibility: The good, the bad and the ugly. Critical Sociology, 34(1), 51-79. https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920507084623 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920507084623
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.
Burgis, T. (2015). The looting machine: Warlords, oligarchs, corporations, smugglers, and the theft of Africa's wealth. William Collins.
Business & Human Rights Resource Centre. (2024). France's duty of vigilance law. https://www.business-humanrights.org/en/big-issues/corporate-legal-accountability/frances-duty-of-vigilance-law/
Busquet, M., Bosma, N., & Hummels, H. (2021). A multidimensional perspective on child labor in the value chain: The case of the cocoa value chain in West Africa. World Development, 146, 105601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105601 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105601
Chirwa, D. M. (2020). Human rights under the African Union. Cambridge University Press.
Choudhury, B. (2023). Corporate law's threat to human rights: Why human rights due diligence might not be enough. Business and Human Rights Journal, 8(2), 180-196. https://doi.org/10.1017/bhj.2023.29 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/bhj.2023.29
Ciravegna, L., & Nieri, F. (2022). Business and human rights: A configurational view of the antecedents of human rights infringements by emerging market firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 179, 431-450. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04861-w DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04861-w
Cornwall, A., & Nyamu-Musembi, C. (2004). Putting the "rights-based approach" to development into perspective. Third World Quarterly, 25(8), 1415-1430. https://doi.org/10.1080/0143659042000308447 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0143659042000308447
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE.
de Boer, T. (2023). Updating public accountability: A conceptual framework of voluntary accountability. Public Management Review, 25(6), 1128-1151. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2021.2006973 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2021.2006973
Deegan, C., & Rankin, M. (1997). The environmental reporting revolution: A review of corporate environmental communication. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 10(4), 506-528.
https://doi.org/10.1108/09513579710367485 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09513579710367485
Denzin, N. K. (2012). Triangulation 2.0. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(2), 80-88. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689812437186 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689812437186
Federal Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs (BMAS). (2023). The German supply chain act explained. Federal Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs.
Freeman, R. E., Phillips, R., & Sisodia, R. (2020). Stakeholder theory: Concepts and strategies. Cambridge University Press.
García-Sánchez, I. M., Raimo, N., Vitolla, F., et al. (2025). Does human-oriented governance foster labor and human rights disclosure? Review of Management Science, 19, 3073-3109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-025-00843-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-025-00843-8
Hale, T., Held, D., & Young, K. (2013). Gridlock: Why global cooperation is failing when we need it most. Polity Press. https://www.politybooks.com/bookdetail/?isbn=9780745662398
Hamann, R., Kapelus, P., & Sonnenberg, D. (2020). Rethinking corporate-community relations in resource economies. Development Southern Africa, 37(4), 555-572.
Hess, D. (2019). The transparency trap: Non-financial disclosure and the responsibility of business to respect human rights. American Business Law Journal, 56(1), 5-53.
https://doi.org/10.1111/ablj.12134 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ablj.12134
Hilson, G., & Laing, T. (2021). Rentier politics in gold mining Ghana. Third World Quarterly, 42(10), 2376-2394.
International Labour Organization. (2015). Recommendation concerning the transition from the informal to the formal economy (Recommendation No. 204). International Labour Organization.
International Labour Organization. (2019). The governance of labour administration and inspection systems. International Labour Organization. https://www.ilo.org/sites/default/files/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_protect/---protrav/---ilo_aids/documents/publication/wcms_831224.pdf
International Labour Organization. (2021). World employment and social outlook: Trends 2021. ILO.
International Labour Organization. (2022). Global wage report 2022-23: The impact of inflation and COVID-19 on wages and purchasing power. https://researchrepository.ilo.org/view/pdfCoverPage?filePid=13113570100002676
International Trade Union Confederation. (2024). ITUC global rights index 2024. https://www.ituc-csi.org/global-rights-index-2024
Kandilige, L., Teye, J. K., Setrana, M., & Badasu, D. M. (2023). "They'd beat us with whatever is available to them": Exploitation and abuse of Ghanaian domestic workers in the Middle East. International Migration, 61(4), 240-256. https://doi.org/10.1111/imig.13096 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/imig.13096
Keay, A. (2010). Stakeholder theory in corporate law: Has it got what it takes? Richmond Journal of Global Law & Business, 9, 249-300. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1531065 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1531065
Khan, A. U., Hussain, U., Rashid, M., & Hameed, R. (2024). Social norms and legal compliance: Understanding the psychological factors influencing adherence to laws in educational settings. Bulletin of Business and Economics, 13(3), 326-332.
Khojastehpour, M., & Jamali, D. (2020). Institutional complexity of host country and corporate social responsibility: Developing vs developed countries. Social Responsibility Journal, 17(5), 593-612. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-04-2019-0138 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-04-2019-0138
Kolev-Schaefer, G., & Neligan, A. (2024). Due diligence - Effect of supply chain regulation: Data-based results on the effects of the German Supply Chain Act (IW-Report No. 8/2024). Institut der deutschen Wirtschaft. http://hdl.handle.net/10419/282995
Kombo, D. K., & Tromp, D. L. A. (2006). Proposal and thesis writing: An introduction. Paulines Publications Africa.
Koos, S. (2022). The German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act 2021 and its impact on globally operating German companies. In Proceedings of the 2nd Riau Annual Meeting on Law and Social Sciences (RAMLAS 2021) (pp. 111-115). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.220406.027 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.220406.027
Methven O'Brien, C., Mehra, A., Blackwell, S., & Poulsen-Hansen, C. B. (2016). National action plans: Current status and future prospects for a new business and human rights governance tool. Business and Human Rights Journal, 1(1), 117-126. https://doi.org/10.1017/bhj.2015.14 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/bhj.2015.14
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). SAGE.
Morris, J., & Rickard, S. (2019). Violence and harassment, including sexual harassment, in garment factories and supply chains (Query 22: WOW Helpdesk report). UK Aid & Work and Opportunities for Women. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5e7ccd0286650c7446207792/Query-22-Sexual-Harassment-Garment-Factories.pdf
Nolan, J. (2016). Mapping the movement: The business and human rights regulatory framework. In D. Baumann-Pauly & J. Nolan (Eds.), Business and human rights: From principles to practice (pp. 19-40). Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/Business-and-Human-Rights-From-Principles-to-Practice/Baumann-Pauly-Nolan/p/book/9781138833562
Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR). (2024). Business and human rights in the Asia-Pacific: Human rights due diligence and stakeholder engagement (Regional engagement report). United Nations. https://www.ohchr.org/en/business-and-human-rights/business-human-rights-and-conflict-affected-regions-project
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.). SAGE.
Peters, A., Gless, S., Thomale, C., & Weller, M.-P. (2020). Business and human rights: Making the legally binding instrument work in public, private and criminal law (MPIL Research Paper No. 2020-06). SSRN. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3561482
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3561482 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3561482
Ruggie, J. G. (2011). Guiding principles on business and human rights. United Nations.
Ruggie, J. G. (2013). Just Business: Multinational corporations and human rights. W. W. Norton.
https://doi.org/10.5553/DQ/221199812014001004002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5553/DQ/221199812014001004002
Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. (2011). The new political role of business in a globalized world: A review of a new perspective on CSR and its implications for the firm, governance, and democracy. Journal of Management Studies, 48, 899-931. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00950.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00950.x
Torelli, R., Fiandrino, S., & Scarpa, F. (2025). Value-enhancing drivers of corporate governance in improving human rights due diligence: Worldwide evidence. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 32(1), 1279-1290. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.3001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.3001
United Nations Human Rights Council. (2011). Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises (A/HRC/17/31). United Nations. https://undocs.org/A/HRC/17/31
Utting, P. (2012). Multi-stakeholder regulation: A critical perspective. In P. Utting (Ed.), The global governance of business responsibility (pp. 105-126). Palgrave Macmillan.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Mwewa Phiri, Dr. Romeo Yohane, Prof. Jason Mwanza (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.












