Evaluating the influence of media strategies on the implementation of media policy protecting children against harmful television content in Nairobi County, Kenya
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51867/AQSSR.3.2.18Keywords:
Children Protection, Harmful Television Content, Media Policy, Parents, Stakeholder InvolvementAbstract
Mass media content in Nairobi, particularly broadcast radio and television, is largely free to air. This unrestricted access poses a significant challenge regarding specific content exhibited and its potential long-term effects on audiences and society. The most affected audience category is children, who risk exposure to unregulated, age-inappropriate content that may cause them harm. This paper therefore evaluated the influence of media strategies on the implementation of media policy protecting children against harmful television content in Nairobi County. The study was grounded in Implementation Theory, which conceptualizes policy execution as a dynamic, interactive process shaped by stakeholder engagement. It adopted a descriptive research design to determine how media policy implementation strategies influence the safeguarding of children. The study involved all child media policy implementing bodies: government agencies, the Media Owners Association, media policy experts, television stations, and parents within Nairobi County. A total of 416 respondents were sampled using Purposive Sampling Technique. Self-administered questionnaires were administered to selected parents, while structured interviews were conducted with other identified respondents. A critical analysis of Kenyan media policy was carried out to examine the extent of stakeholder involvement, establishing a relationship between stakeholder involvement and policy implementation. Data was analyzed using linear regression. The study found that while media policy implementation strategies are generally sufficient, they do not guarantee adherence to set guidelines. Moreover, unlike media agencies, parents demonstrate low awareness of mechanisms regulating safe children's television content. The study recommends civic education and participation by all stakeholders in media policy formulation and strategies, as well as continuous review of existing policies governing safe children's television content.
References
Achieng, L. (2021). Protection of children rights: Call to adherence to the journalism code of conduct [Advisory press release]. Media Council of Kenya. https://mediacouncil.or.ke
American Psychological Association. (2013). Violence in the media: Psychologists study potential harmful effects. https://www.apa.org/topics/video-game-violence/media-violence
Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Prentice-Hall.
Capano, G., & Woo, J. (2018). Designing policy robustness: Outputs and processes. Policy and Society, 37(4), 422-440.
https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2018.1504494
Ebekozien, A., Aigbavboa, C., & Ramotshela, M. (2023). A qualitative approach to investigate stakeholders' engagement in construction projects. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 30(5), 1463-1477.
Federal Communications Commission. (2019). Children's television programming rules: Modernization of media regulation initiative. Federal Register. https://www.federalregister.gov
Fitzpatrick, C., Oghia, J., & Pagani, L. (2016). Early childhood exposure to media violence: What parents and policymakers ought to know. South African Journal of Childhood Education, 6(1), Article a431.
https://doi.org/10.4102/sajce.v6i1.431
Gentile, D. (Ed.). (2014). Media violence and children: A complete guide for parents and professionals (2nd ed.). Praeger. https://doi.org/10.5040/9798400684227
Grossman, E. (2022). Media and policy making in the digital age. Annual Review of Political Science, 25, 443-461.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051120-103422
Jordan, A. (2008). The impact of media policy on children's media exposure. The Annenberg Public Policy Center, University of Pennsylvania.
Jordan, A. (2012). The impact of media policy on children's media exposure. In The international encyclopedia of media studies. Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444361506.wbiems138
Kothari, C. R. (2009). Research methodology: Methods and techniques (2nd ed.). New Age International.
Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607-610. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308
Levin, D. E. (1998). Remote control childhood? Combating the hazards of media culture. National Association for the Education of Young Children.
Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. Russell Sage Foundation.
https://doi.org/10.2307/1288305
Makali, D. (2003). Media law and practice: The Kenyan jurisprudence. Phencons Printers and Designers.
May, C. R. (2013). Towards a general theory of implementation. Implementation Science, 8, Article 18.
https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-8-18
Media Action. (2023). Kenya: Media landscape report. BBC. https://www.communityengagementhub.org
Media Council of Kenya. (2020). Media sector legislative review. https://mediacouncil.or.ke
Natwarsinh, R. (2019). Effect of media on children behaviour: Media psychological perspective. The International Journal of Indian Psychology, 7(4), 128-133.
Ontario, O. (2017). Screen time and young children: Promoting health and development in a digital world. Paediatrics & Child Health, 22(8), 461-468. https://doi.org/10.1093/pch/pxx123
Oyero, O., & Salawu, A. (2018). Building media capacity for children sustainability in Africa: Educational and partnership imperatives. SAGE Open, 8(2), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244018763930
Patty, J. (2023). Working towards a general theory of implementation: An organizational implementation and management perspective. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Article muad014. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muad014
Pearce, K. E., Gonzales, A., & Welles, B. F. (2020). Introduction: Marginality and social media. Social Media & Society, 6(2), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120930413
Polyák, I., & Meuter, M. (2016). The status of media self-regulation in Central Europe. Center for Media, Data and Society, Central European University.
Pressman, J. L., & Wildavsky, A. (1973). Implementation: How great expectations in Washington are dashed in Oakland. University of California Press.
Refugee Consortium of Kenya. (2020). The Children Act, 2001. Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. https://www.ohchr.org
Reynolds, A. (2018). Journalism ethics and law: A handbook for media practitioners. Oxford University Press.
Sabatier, P., & Mazmanian, D. (1980). The implementation of public policy: A framework of analysis. Policy Studies Journal, 8(4), 538-560. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.1980.tb01266.x
Wanyama, L. (2015). Media control in Kenya: The state of broadcasting under the new Kenya Information and Communication Act of 2013. New Media and Mass Communication, 33, 1-12.
Watkins, C., & Hornak, R. (2022). A review of implementation science theories, models and frameworks through an equity lens. National Implementation Research Network.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Samson Guatai Raiji, Prof. Hellen K. Mberia, Dr. Augustus O. Nyakundi (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.












