Unlocking the relationship between assistive technology and academic transformation of learners with hearing impairment in Tanzania: Insights from selected schools Dar-es-salaam and Tabora Region

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51867/AQSSR.3.4.17

Keywords:

Assistive Technology, Academic Transformation, Educational Technology, Inclusive Education, Learners with Hearing Impairment, Tanzania

Abstract

Assistive technology is increasingly recognised as an important means of improving access, participation and learning among learners with hearing impairment. This study examined the relationship between assistive technology and academic transformation among learners with hearing impairment in selected schools in Dar-es-Salaam and Tabora Regions, Tanzania. Specifically, the study assessed the availability and utilisation of assistive technologies and determined their statistical relationship with academic transformation. The study was informed by technological acceptance model (TAM). A quantitative research approach guided by a cross-sectional research design was employed. The study involved 234 respondents, comprising 90 learners with hearing impairment and 144 teachers. Purposive sampling was used to select relevant schools, while total population sampling was applied where eligible respondents were small and manageable. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire. Data were analysed using frequencies, percentages, chi-square tests and binary logistic regression, with statistical significance determined at p < .05. The findings indicate a critical gap between the presence of assistive technology and its effective educational utilisation. Many respondents reported inadequacies in hearing aids, Frequency Modulation (FM) systems, Digital Modulation (DM) systems, captioning, visual alert systems and tablets with educational applications. Chi-square results showed statistically significant associations between academic transformation and hearing aids (χ² = 14.833, p = .001) and FM systems (χ² = 17.297, p = .001), whereas tablets (χ² = .758, p = .384), DM systems (χ² = .361, p = .548), and visual alert systems (χ² = 3.689, p = .055) did not demonstrate statistically significant associations. Logistic regression further showed that adequate hearing aids significantly increased the likelihood of academic transformation (AOR = 2.37, p = .015), while satisfaction with FM systems was also positively associated with academic transformation (AOR = 2.75, p = .003). These findings suggest that assistive technology contributes to academic transformation when it directly addresses learners’ communication and classroom-access needs and is adequately available and effectively integrated. The study concludes that technology provision alone is insufficient; effective management, maintenance, teacher support and meaningful classroom utilisation are essential for converting assistive technology into educational benefit. The study therefore recommends strengthened investment in appropriate assistive technologies, teacher capacity-building, technical support and systematic monitoring of their classroom use.

References

Ahmed, A. (2018). Perceptions of using assistive technology for students with disabilities in the classroom. International Journal of Special Education, 33(1), 129-139.

Ainscow, M., & Miles, S. (2009). Developing inclusive education systems: How can we move policies forward? In La educación inclusiva: De la exclusión a la plena participación de todo el alumnado (pp. 167-170). Horsori Editorial.

Alharbi, S. (2016). Benefits and barriers: Incorporating assistive technology in an inclusive setting for primary school students with learning disabilities in language arts. American Research Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 2(1), 1-1. https://doi.org/10.21694/2378-7031.16016

Alimi, A., Babalola, E., Aladesusi, G., Issa, A., & Omolafe, E. (2021). Availability and utilization of assistive technology for learning among students with special needs in Ilorin, Kwara State. Indonesian Journal of Community and Special Needs Education, 2(1), 17-28. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijcsne.v2i1.37916

Alkahtani, K. D. (2013). Teachers' knowledge and use of assistive technology for students with special educational needs. Journal of Studies in Education, 3(2), 65-86.

https://doi.org/10.5296/jse.v3i2.3424

Apentiik, C. R. A., & Parpart, J. L. (2012). Working in different cultures: Issues of race, ethnicity and identity. In Doing development research. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849208925.n4

Borg, J., Berman-Bieler, R., Khasnabis, C., Mitra, G., Myhill, W. N., & Raja, D. S. (2015). Assistive technology for children with disabilities: Creating opportunities for education, inclusion and participation: A discussion paper. World Health Organization. https://www.unicef.org/media/126246/file/Assistive-Tech-Web.pdf

Borg, J., Östergren, P.-O., Larsson, S., Rahman, A. A., Bari, N., & Khan, A. N. (2012). Assistive technology use is associated with reduced capability poverty: A cross-sectional study in Bangladesh. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 7(2), 112-121. https://doi.org/10.3109/17483107.2011.602173

Bryant, F. B., Chadwick, E. D., & Kluwe, K. (2011). Understanding the processes that regulate positive emotional experience: Unsolved problems and future directions for theory and research on savoring. International Journal of Wellbeing, 1(1), 107-126. https://doi.org/10.5502/ijw.v1i1.18

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

Jullu, G. T., & Wandela, E. (2025). Assessing the availability of educational facilities for students with hearing impairments in inclusive secondary schools of Morogoro Municipality, Tanzania. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2025/v51i112642

Mishra, S., Laplante-Levesque, A., Barbareschi, G., Witte, L. D., Abdi, S., Spann, A., … Allen, M. (2024). Assistive technology needs, access and coverage, and related barriers and facilitators in the WHO European region: A scoping review. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 19(2), 474-485. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2022.2099021

Ndibalema, P. (2025). Perspectives on barriers to learning opportunities among deaf children in Tanzania. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 9, Article 100468. https://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijedro

Schafer, E. C., & Wolfe, J. (2010). Hearing assistance technology for children: Candidacy and selection. Seminars in Hearing, 31(3), 219-232. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0030-1262327

Senjam, S. S., & Manna, S. (2024). Assistive technology and disabilities in the context of sustainable developmental goals. In G. Bennett & E. Goodall (Eds.), The Palgrave encyclopedia of disability. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-40858-8_67-1

Stanislaus, E. (2026). The influence of teachers' inclusive pedagogical practices on the academic participation of learners with hearing impairment in public secondary schools in Tanzania. International Journal of Research in Social Science and Humanities, 7(7), 118-129. https://doi.org/10.47505/IJRSS.2026.7.9

UNESCO. (2020). Global education monitoring report: Thematic material on inclusion and education. https://gem-report-2020.unesco.org/thematic/

Downloads

Published

2026-10-11

How to Cite

Stanislaus, E. (2026). Unlocking the relationship between assistive technology and academic transformation of learners with hearing impairment in Tanzania: Insights from selected schools Dar-es-salaam and Tabora Region. African Quarterly Social Science Review, 3(4), 210-219. https://doi.org/10.51867/AQSSR.3.4.17

Similar Articles

1-10 of 333

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.