The role of literary works in multilingual societies: Preserving culture, promoting commination, and fostering social cohesion in Northern Province of Rwanda

Authors

  • Albert Nshimiyimana University of Rwanda, Rwanda Author
  • Joel Nikuze University of Rwanda Author
  • Vedaste Ntagwabira IPRC Kigali, Rwanda Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51867/AQSSR.3.2.34

Keywords:

Cultural Preservation, Identity, Literature, Multilingual Society, Social Cohesion, Translation

Abstract

This study investigates the role of literary works in multilingual societies, basing it on their contribution to cultural preservation, communication enhancement, and social cohesion. Within multilingual contexts, whereby multiple languages are used due to historical, social, or political factors, literary works act as a critical medium for expressing identity, transmitting cultural values, and fostering intellectual understanding. The study worked along with sociolinguistic theory to uncover the image of language in society and postcolonial theory to illustrate the way literature and language interplay with identity. This research uses a quantitative research approach using a descriptive research approach and critical analysis of literary work such as folktales, poetry, and novels through semi-structured interviews with educators and cultural practitioners. The research employs readers to give insights of perception of literature’s social influence. Through stratified sampling methods, 44 respondents were sampled from a total population of 50. Descriptive data was analyzed through descriptive statistics. The findings from questionnaires were recorded into the tables and interpreted by explaining the meaning of figures. The results illustrate that literature functions as a repository of cultural knowledge, preserving traditions and norms and keeping memory in societies experiencing language shifts or dominance of global languages. Transitions and bilingual publication support cross-cultural dialogue, improve second language learning, and encourage empathy among speakers of various linguistic backgrounds. Furthermore, shared literary experiences contribute to social cohesion, enabling communities to address social issues, amplify minority voices, and foster tolerance and inclusivity. Even if there are benefits, challenges, such as the dominance of global languages, lack of translated works, and literary barriers, constrain the reach and effectiveness of multilingual literature. The research concludes that literary works are useful instruments for sustaining cultural heritage, enhancing communication across language groups, and strengthening social unity in multilingual societies. It recommends increased support for local language literature, translation initiatives, integration of multilingual texts in educational curricula, and further research on youth engagement with multilingual literature. By highlighting the intersection of language, culture, and literature, this research contributes to sociolinguistics, literary studies, and cultural policy, providing insights into how literature can shape an inclusive, cohesive, and culturally resilient society.

References

Achebe, C. (1975). Morning yet on creation day. Heinemann.

Anderson, B. (1983). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. Verso.

Ashcroft, B., Griffiths, G., & Tiffin, H. (2002). The empire writes back: Theory and practice in post-colonial literatures (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203426081 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203426081

Baker, C. (2011). Foundations of bilingual education and bilingualism (5th ed.). Multilingual Matters.

Bakhtin, M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays. University of Texas Press.

Bamgbose, A. (1991). Language and nation: The language question in sub-Saharan Africa. Edinburgh University Press.

Banks, A. (2009). Multicultural education: Issues and perspectives (7th ed.). Wiley.

Bhola, H. S. (1987). Review of Decolonising the mind: The politics of language in African literature, by Ngũgĩ wa Thiong'o. African Studies Review, 30(2), 102-103. https://doi.org/10.2307/524049 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/524049

Bryman, A. (2021). Social research methods (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.

Coupland, N., Bishop, H., Williams, A., Evans, B., & Garrett, P. (2005). Affiliation, engagement, language use and vitality: Secondary school students' subjective orientations to Welsh and Welshness. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 8(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/jBEB.v8.i1.pg1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/jBEB.v8.i1.pg1

Creswell, J. W. (2008). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (3rd ed.). Pearson.

Crystal, D. (2003). English as a global language (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Fishman, J. A. (1991). Reversing language shift: Theoretical and empirical foundations of assistance to threatened languages. Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.33169466 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.33169466

Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays. Basic Books.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. Edward Arnold.

Kramsch, C. (1998). Language and culture. Oxford University Press.

Mittal, S., Khan, M. A., Yadav, V., & Sharma, M. K. (2024). Footwear as product-service systems: Toward sustainable alternative consumption scenarios. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(2), 726-741. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3519 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3519

Patton, M. Q. (2001). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.

Pennycook, A. (2010). Language as a local practice. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203846223 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203846223

Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon & Schuster.

https://doi.org/10.1145/358916.361990 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/358916.361990

Romaine, S. (2000). Language in society: An introduction to sociolinguistics. Oxford University Press.

https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198731924.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198731924.001.0001

Said, E. W. (1978). Orientalism. Pantheon Books.

Spolsky, B. (2004). Language policy. Cambridge University Press.

UNESCO. (2003). Convention for the safeguarding of the intangible cultural heritage. UNESCO.

Venuti, L. (1995). The translator's invisibility: A history of translation. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203360064 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203360064

Widdowson, H. G. (1994). The ownership of English. TESOL Quarterly, 28(2), 377-389. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587438 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3587438

Yamane, T. (1967). Statistics: An introductory analysis (2nd ed.). Harper & Row.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-19

How to Cite

Nshimiyimana, A., Nikuze, J., & Ntagwabira, V. (2026). The role of literary works in multilingual societies: Preserving culture, promoting commination, and fostering social cohesion in Northern Province of Rwanda. African Quarterly Social Science Review, 3(2), 382-390. https://doi.org/10.51867/AQSSR.3.2.34

Similar Articles

1-10 of 156

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.