Effectiveness of micro-learning as an instructional innovation in basic education: The case of a public basic school in Ghana

Emmanuella Hemeng; Alfred Kuranchie; Judith Bampo

doi:10.51867/AQSSR.3.3.27

Auteurs-es

Emmanuella Hemeng University of Education, Winneba, Ghana Auteur-e https://orcid.org/0009-0001-9137-044X
Alfred Kuranchie University of Education, Winneba, Ghana Auteur-e https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8773-7766
Judith Bampo University of Education, Winneba, Ghana Auteur-e https://orcid.org/0009-0007-7804-5072

DOI :

https://doi.org/10.51867/AQSSR.3.3.27

Mots-clés :

Basic School, Learner Performance, Microlearning, Quasi-Experiment, Ghana

Résumé

Present-day learners are accustomed to interactive and engaging methods of learning with the aid of technological tools. In line with this, microlearning has emerged as an innovative approach to learning. While widely studied in corporate training and higher education, studies at the basic educational level, specifically, as a classroom-based, formally structured and collectively paced instructional tool used in real time are limited. This study investigated the efficacy of microlearning as an instructional innovation in basic education, specifically the impact of microlearning on learner performance and the perceptions of teachers and a head teacher on the use of microlearning. The Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning guided this study. An embedded mixed-methods design was employed. The study involved seventy-three learners, two teachers and one head teacher. For the quantitative phase, an experiment was conducted on seventy-three learners who were randomly assigned into three classes. Data were collected through pre- and post-tests and analysed using Kruskal–Wallis and Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Tests. For the qualitative phase, data were gathered via semi-structured interviews with the participants to explore their perceptions of microlearning. Qualitative data collected from the interviews were analysed using thematic analysis. Results indicated that the microlearning significantly improved learner performance. The participants also had positive perceptions of microlearning, emphasising that the teaching technique compared to traditional instruction, enhanced engagement and comprehension due to the use of brief lessons combining visuals, narrations, and text. Nonetheless, the participants had concerns regarding implementing microlearning in everyday classroom due to challenges such as financial constraints and technical competence. The study concluded that microlearning has a strong potential to enhance learning outcomes and should be considered as an instructional approach in regular classroom practice. Recommendations were provided for considering its adoption in regular teaching practices and the provision of skills training to teachers on its use.

Biographies de l'auteur-e

Emmanuella Hemeng, University of Education, Winneba, Ghana

Department of Educational Administration and Management
Alfred Kuranchie, University of Education, Winneba, Ghana

Department of Social Studies Education
Judith Bampo, University of Education, Winneba, Ghana

Department of Educational Administration and Management

Références

Al-Ani, W. T. (2013). Blended learning approach using Moodle and students' achievement at Sultan Qaboos University in Oman. Journal of Education and Learning, 2(3), 96-110. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v2n3p96

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide to understanding and doing. Sage Publications. https://study.sagepub.com/thematicanalysis

Brolund, L. (2016). Student success through instructional leadership. BU Journal of Graduate Studies in Education, 8(2), 42-45. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1230490.pdf

Buchem, I., & Hamelmann, H. (2010). Microlearning: A strategy for ongoing professional development. e-Learning Papers, 21(7), 1-15.

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Sage Publications. https://collegepublishing.sagepub.com/products/designing-and-conducting-mixed-methods-research-3-241842

Dolasinski, M. J., & Reynolds, J. (2021). Microlearning in the higher education hospitality classroom. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Education, 35(2), 133-142. https://doi.org/10.1080/10963758.2021.1963748

Eden, E., Latorre, A., & Chen, W. F. (2020). Microlearning in e-learning: Best practices and future trends. In Proceedings of the Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 734-739). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). https://www.learntechlib.org/p/215818/

Fidan, M. (2023). The effects of microlearning-supported flipped classroom on pre-service teachers' learning performance, motivation, and engagement. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 12687-12714. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11639-2

Firmender, J. M., Gavin, M. K., & McCoach, D. B. (2014). Examining the relationship between teachers' instructional practices and students' mathematics achievement. Journal of Advanced Academics, 25(3), 214-236. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X14538032

Geng, S., Law, K. M. Y., & Niu, B. (2019). Investigating self-directed learning and technology readiness in blending learning environments. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0147-0

George, D., & Mallery, P. (2010). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference, 17.0 update (10th ed.). Allyn & Bacon.

Giurgiu, L. (2017). Microlearning: An evolving e-learning trend. Scientific Bulletin, 22(1), 18-23. https://doi.org/10.1515/bsaft-2017-0003

Greaves, T., Hayes, J., Wilson, L., Gielniak, M., & Peterson, R. (2010). The technology factor: Nine keys to student achievement and cost-effectiveness. Market Data Retrieval. https://www.k12blueprint.com/sites/default/files/Project-RED-Technolgy-Factor.pdf

Hu, C., & Liu, Y. (2020). Construction and application of micro technology platform in applied technology universities under the background of Internet Plus. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1533(2), 022112. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1533/2/022112

Hug, T. (2005). Micro learning and narration: Exploring possibilities of utilization of narrations and storytelling for the designing of "micro units" and didactical micro-learning arrangements. In Proceedings of the Fourth Media in Transition Conference: The Work of Stories (pp. 1-14). Massachusetts Institute of Technology. https://web.mit.edu/comm-forum/legacy/mit4/papers/hug.pdf

Huo, C., & Shen, B. (2015). Teaching reform of English listening and speaking in China based on mobile microlearning. Creative Education, 6, 2221-2226. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2015.620228

Javorcik, T., & Polasek, R. (2019). Comparing the effectiveness of microlearning and e-learning courses in the education of future teachers. In 2019 17th International Conference on Emerging eLearning Technologies and Applications (ICETA) (pp. 309-314). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICETA48886.2019.9040034

Kovachev, D., Cao, Y., Klamma, R., & Jarke, M. (2011). Learn-as-you-go: New ways of cloud-based micro-learning for the mobile web. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Vol. 6964, pp. 51-61). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25813-8_6

Kuranchie, A. (2021). Research made easy. Bookworm Publications.

Leela, S., Chookaew, S., & Nilsook, P. (2019). An effective microlearning approach using living book to promote vocational students' computational thinking. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Digital Technology in Education (pp. 25-29). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3369199.3369200

Lynch, D., & Knight, B. A. (2011). Issues in contemporary teaching. AACLMP Press.

Mayer, R. E. (2024). The past, present, and future of the Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning. Educational Psychology Review, 36(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09842-1

McKee, C., & Ntokos, K. (2022). Online microlearning and student engagement in computer games higher education. Research in Learning Technology, 30, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v30.2680

Mohammed, G. S., Wakil, K., & Nawroly, S. S. (2018). The effectiveness of microlearning to improve students' learning ability. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 3(3), 32-38. https://doi.org/10.24331/ijere.415824

Monib, W. K., Qazi, A., & Apong, R. A. (2025). Microlearning beyond boundaries: A systematic review and a novel framework for improving learning outcomes. Heliyon, 11(2), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e41413

Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Okyere, M., Kuranchie, A., Larbi, E., & Twene, C. (2018). Essentials of assessment in schools. Great Impressions.

Palti, A., & Rosenberg-Kima, R. B. (2022). Self-regulated learning with task-centered microlearning. In C. Chinn, E. Tan, C. Chan, & Y. Kali (Eds.), Proceedings of the 16th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS 2022) (pp. 1954-1955). International Society of the Learning Sciences. https://repository.isls.org//handle/1/9000

Purković, D., Kovačević, S., & Delač, D. (2024). The new role of the teacher in Education 4.0. In Proceedings of the 10th International Scientific Conference Technics, Informatics and Education (TIE 2024) (pp. 153-160). University of Kragujevac, Faculty of Technical Sciences Čačak. https://doi.org/10.46793/TIE24.153P

Riswanto, A., & Aryani, S. (2017). Learning motivation and student achievement: Description analysis and relationships both. COUNS-EDU: The International Journal of Counseling and Education, 2(1), 42-47. https://doi.org/10.23916/002017026010

Sankaranarayanan, R. (2022). Influence of microlearning approach on introductory database programming concepts (Publication No. 30503847) [Doctoral dissertation, Indiana University]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED646178

Sankaranarayanan, R., Leung, J., Abramenka-Lachheb, V., Seo, G., & Lachheb, A. (2022). Microlearning in diverse contexts: A bibliometric analysis. TechTrends, 67(2), 260-276. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-022-00794-x

Semingson, P., Crosslin, M., & Dellinger, J. T. (2015). Microlearning as a tool to engage students in online and blended learning. In D. Rutledge & D. Slykhuis (Eds.), Proceedings of the Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 474-479). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). https://www.learntechlib.org/p/150037/

Silva, E. S., Costa, W. P. d., Lima, J. C. d., & Ferreira, J. C. (2025). Contribution of microlearning in basic education: A systematic review. Education Sciences, 15(3), 302. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15030302

Söderberg, K. (2023). What's the deal with microlearning? RISE Research Institutes of Sweden. http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2:1744733

Steinmayr, R., Meißner, A., Weidinger, A., & Wirthwein, L. (2015). Academic achievement. In Oxford Bibliographies of Education. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/obo/9780199756810-0108

Suleiman, I., Dalong, J. O., & Paksokot, D. (2025). Development and evaluation of a microlearning module for teaching and learning English language for basic education class in Plateau State, Nigeria. Greener Journal of Education and Training Studies, 8(1), 22-27. https://doi.org/10.15580/gjets.2025.1.111725176

Susilana, R., Dewi, L., Rullyana, G., Hadiapurwa, A., & Khaerunnisa, N. (2022). Can microlearning strategy assist students' online learning? Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 41(2), 437-451. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v41i2.43387

Tufan, D. (2021). Multimedia design principles for microlearning. In J. R. Corbeil, B. H. Khan, & M. E. Corbeil (Eds.), Microlearning in the digital age: The design and delivery of learning in snippets (pp. 58-79). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367821623-6

Wen, C., & Zhang, J. (2015). Design of a microlecture mobile learning system based on smartphone and web platforms. IEEE Transactions on Education, 58(3), 203-207. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2014.2363627

Wiersma, W., & Jurs, S. G. (1990). Educational measurement and testing (2nd ed.). Allyn & Bacon.

Yin, J., Goh, T., Yang, B., & Xiaobin, Y. (2020). Conversation technology with micro-learning: The impact of chatbot-based learning on students' learning motivation and performance. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 59(1), 154-177. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633120952067

Young, M. R., Klemz, B. R., & Murphy, J. W. (2003). Enhancing learning outcomes: The effects of instructional technology, learning styles, instructional methods, and student behavior. Journal of Marketing Education, 25(2), 130-142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475303254004

Závodná, M., Mrázová, M., Poruba, J., Javorčík, T., Guncaga, J., Havlásková, T., Tran, D., & Kostolányová, K. (2024). Microlearning: Innovative digital learning for various educational contexts and groups. In Proceedings of the 23rd European Conference on e-Learning (pp. 442-450). Academic Conferences International. https://doi.org/10.34190/ecel.23.1.2590

Zhang, B., Yin, C., David, B., Chalon, R., & Xiong, Z. (2015). A context-aware mobile system for work-based learning. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 24(2), 263-276. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.21704

Zulueta, L., & Panoy, J. F. (2022). Scenario-based microlearning strategy for improved basic science process skills in self-directed learning. International Journal of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics, 2, 54-73. https://doi.org/10.53378/352932