Beyond cultural exchange: Constraints, sustainability and emerging opportunities in Kenya–United States cultural diplomacy
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.51867/AQSSR.3.4.44Mots-clés :
Cultural diplomacy, Digital diplomacy, , Kenya-USA Relations, Educational Diplomacy,Résumé
Cultural diplomacy has become increasingly important in contemporary international relations as states and non-state actors use educational, cultural, institutional, and people-to-people engagement to complement conventional diplomacy. However, the sustainability of such engagement depends on the financial, mobility, representational, institutional, political, and technological conditions within which cultural programmes operate. This study examined the constraints affecting cultural diplomacy between Kenya and the United States and assessed emerging opportunities for strengthening its sustainability, inclusiveness, and resilience. The study was guided by Soft Power Theory and Liberalism Theory and employed descriptive and evaluative research designs within a mixed-methods approach. The target population comprised stakeholders involved in or knowledgeable about Kenya–United States cultural diplomacy, including diplomatic and foreign-affairs actors, cultural practitioners, exchange-programme participants, media professionals, university and programme representatives, and diaspora and community actors. From an accessible population of approximately 3,000, a target quantitative sample of 360 respondents was established, of whom 359 completed the questionnaire. Stratified random sampling was used to select questionnaire respondents across stakeholder categories and country contexts, while purposive and snowball sampling was used to identify information-rich qualitative participants. Data were collected through structured questionnaires, semi-structured interviews, focus group discussions, open-ended responses, and documentary analysis. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, including frequencies, percentages, means, and standard deviations where appropriate, while qualitative data were analyzed thematically and integrated with quantitative findings through methodological triangulation. The findings identified five interconnected constraints: inadequate and unstable financial resources, visa and mobility barriers, cultural stereotypes and representational limitations, political and institutional discontinuity, and unequal technological connectivity. Conversely, educational and university partnerships, creative-industry collaboration, digital diplomacy, diaspora and alumni networks, and community-based engagement emerged as important opportunities for widening participation and sustaining bilateral cultural relations. The study concludes that sustainable Kenya–United States cultural diplomacy requires a transition from episodic cultural encounters to institutionalized, reciprocal, and networked relationships capable of enduring funding cycles, political transitions, and geographical barriers. It recommends diversified financing, improved mobility facilitation, strengthened university and multi-actor partnerships, structured diaspora and alumni engagement, hybrid physical-digital programming, broader socioeconomic and geographical inclusion, and evaluation mechanisms that prioritize the quality and longevity of relationships.
Références
Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Addison-Wesley.
Bennett, M. J. (1993). Towards ethnorelativism: A developmental model of intercultural sensitivity. In R. M. Paige (Ed.), Education for the intercultural experience (2nd ed., pp. 21-71). Intercultural Press.
Bilate, G. T., & Zou, X. (2022). Digital diplomacy and implementation challenges in Africa: Case study of Ethiopia. Journal of African Foreign Affairs, 9(2), 85-106. https://doi.org/10.31920/2056-5658/2022/v9n2a5
Bjola, C., & Holmes, M. (Eds.). (2015). Digital diplomacy: Theory and practice. Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315730844
Bouquerel, F., Dabdoub Nasser, C., & Magkou, M. (2026). Mobility in EU cultural diplomacy and cultural relations: Ambiguities and the value of partnerships in the Southern and Eastern Mediterranean. Journal of Cultural Management and Cultural Policy, 12(1), 209-224. https://doi.org/10.1177/27018466261443364
Cull, N. J. (2008). Public diplomacy: Taxonomies and histories. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616(1), 31-54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716207311952
Cummings, M. C., Jr. (2003). Cultural diplomacy and the United States government: A survey. Center for Arts and Culture. https://www.americansforthearts.org/sites/default/files/MCCpaper.pdf
Deardorff, D. K. (2006). Identification and assessment of intercultural competence as a student outcome of internationalization. Journal of Studies in International Education, 10(3), 241-266. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315306287002
Gilboa, E. (2008). Searching for a theory of public diplomacy. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616(1), 55-77. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716207312142
Goff, P. M. (2013). Cultural diplomacy. In A. F. Cooper, J. Heine, & R. Thakur (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of modern diplomacy (pp. 419-435). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199588862.013.0024
Ho, E. L. E., & McConnell, F. (2019). Conceptualizing "diaspora diplomacy": Territory and populations betwixt the domestic and foreign. Progress in Human Geography, 43(2), 235-255. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132517740217
Keohane, R. O., & Nye, J. S., Jr. (1977). Power and interdependence: World politics in transition. Little, Brown.
Manor, I. (2019). The digitalization of public diplomacy. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04405-3
Manor, I., & Adiku, G. A. (2021). From "traitors" to "saviours": A longitudinal analysis of Ethiopian, Kenyan and Rwandan embassies' practice of digital diaspora diplomacy. South African Journal of International Affairs, 28(3), 403-427. https://doi.org/10.1080/10220461.2021.1948915
Melissen, J. (Ed.). (2005). The new public diplomacy: Soft power in international relations. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230554931
Mutisya, M., Maluki, P., & Adar, K. (2024). The role of digital diplomacy in advancing foreign policy in Africa: The case of Kenya and South Africa. Journal of African Foreign Affairs, 11(3), 23-48. https://doi.org/10.31920/2056-5658/2024/v11n3a2
Mwazighe, R. C. (2021). The role of diaspora diplomacy in advancing national interests in Africa: A case study of Kenya [Master's research project, University of Nairobi]. University of Nairobi Digital Repository. http://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke/handle/11295/161042
Norris, P. (2001). Digital divide: Civic engagement, information poverty, and the Internet worldwide. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139164887
Nye, J. S., Jr. (2004). Soft power: The means to success in world politics. Public Affairs.
Nye, J. S., Jr. (2011). The future of power. Public Affairs.
Yelwa, S. U., & John, A. W. (2026). Nigeria's diaspora diplomacy in practice: Evaluating NiDCOM's intervention in xenophobic attacks on Nigerians in South Africa (2015-2019). Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 17(2), 206-222. https://doi.org/10.36941/mjss-2026-0092
Zaharna, R. S. (2010). Battles to bridges: U.S. strategic communication and public diplomacy after 9/11. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230277922
Zhang, Y., & Ong'ong'a, D. O. (2022). Unveiling China's digital diplomacy: A comparative analysis of CGTN Africa and BBC News Africa on Facebook. Asian Journal of Comparative Politics, 7(3), 661-683. https://doi.org/10.1177/20578911211068217
Zhu, B., & Faucher, C. (2026). Cultural diplomacy's challenges: Rethinking them through knowledge brokering. The Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society, 56(2), 136-152. https://doi.org/10.1080/10632921.2025.2568847
Téléchargements
Publié
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
© Timothy Kitui Wanyonyi, Prof. Kennedy Onkware, Dr. Elijah Onyango Standslause Odhiambo (Author) 2026

Cette œuvre est sous licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d'Utilisation Commerciale 4.0 International.












