Scheduled desludging model and pit latrine emptying mitigation measures for peri-urban areas, Lusaka, Zambia: A hermeneutic phenomenological approach

James Mwale; Vincent Kanyamuna; John Moose; Francis Simui

doi:10.51867/AQSSR.3.1.2

Authors

James Mwale University of Zambia Author https://orcid.org/0009-0009-3554-2153
Vincent Kanyamuna University of Zambia Author https://orcid.org/0009-0008-6552-2770
John Moose University of Zambia Author
Francis Simui University of Zambia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51867/AQSSR.3.1.2

Keywords:

Partial Payment, Pit Latrine Emptying, Scheduled Desludging, Stakeholders Participation

Abstract

The study purpose was to improve the sanitation situation in George Compound, one of the peri-urban areas in Lusaka, Zambia. The researcher adopted an interpretive hermeneutic paradigm in which knowledge was established through Gadamer’s hermeneutic cycle, relying on iterations and fusion of horizons by merging the researcher’s background and participants’ views. Epistemologically, the researcher adopted a subjective epistemological stance in which knowledge was generated through the researcher’s personal experiences and reflective interaction with participants. Further, the researcher adopted a value-bound axiological stance, hence acknowledging his positionality in terms of personal background, experience, values, and beliefs. The study sample size was 29 participants, disaggregated as 10 males, 15 women, and 4 key informants. The study uncovers that scheduled desludging is a strategy that ensures predictable and affordable pit emptying. The study established that households register their pit latrines and make small routine contributions to facilitate emptying. The study further notes that the introduction of scheduled desludging enables community residents in the peri-urban areas to easily empty the pit latrines once they fill up. Moreover, the desludging has environmental and public health benefits, which include, among others, prevention of the pit latrines from overflowing due to delayed pit emptying of pit latrines by most customers, which is typical of most peri-urban areas in Lusaka. The study informs policy on strengthening the capacity of service providers to ensure a timely and efficient turnaround period for desludging. Ensure strengthening the environmental laws on licensing of transporters of effluent to avert desludging in the open environment premised on the low restorative charges that are significantly non-deterrent to the polluters. The study concludes that scheduled desludging is a game changer in resolving on-site sanitation pit emptying challenges given the financial constraints that many residents face. The study recommends strengthening capacities of service providers to ensure a timely and efficient turnaround period of desludging. The finding is novel because it offers peri-urban and institutional insights into pit emptying through scheduled desludging, considering that desludging previously lacked a scheduled plan; as a result, most households chose to relocate and construct new pit latrines elsewhere. The study purpose was to improve the sanitation situation in George Compound, one of the peri-urban areas in Lusaka, Zambia.

References

AfDB. (2015). Lusaka sanitation programme-Climate resilient sustainable infrastructure-ESMF summary. African Development Bank.

African Union. (2015). Agenda 2063: The Africa we want. African Union Commission.

Ahmed, S. K. (2024). The pillars of trustworthiness in qualitative research. Journal of Medicine, Surgery, and Public Health, 2, 100051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glmedi.2024.100051 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glmedi.2024.100051

Akhter, S. (2022). Key informants' interviews. In M. R. Islam, N. A. Khan, & R. Baikady (Eds.), Principles of social research methodology (pp. 389-403). Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-5441-2_27 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-5441-2_27

Akumuntu, J. B., Wehn, U., Mulenga, M., & Brdjanovic, D. (2017). Enabling the sustainable faecal sludge management service delivery chain: A case study of dense settlements in Kigali, Rwanda. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health, 220(6), 960-973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheh.2017.05.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheh.2017.05.001

Arias-Gómez, J., Villasís-Keever, M. Á., & Miranda-Novales, M. G. (2016). El protocolo de investigación III: La población de estudio. Revista Alergia México, 63(2), 201-206. https://doi.org/10.29262/ram.v63i2.181 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29262/ram.v63i2.181

Beehner, C. G. (2025). Systems theory. In S. Dhiman (Ed.), The Palgrave encyclopedia of leadership and organizational change (pp. 1-4). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-51650-4_39-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-51650-4_39-1

Brown, J., Albert, J., & Whittington, D. (2019). Community-led total sanitation moves the needle on ending open defecation in Zambia. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 100(4), 767-769. https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.19-0151 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.19-0151

Brown, N., Nemcik, J., & Petti, M. (2012). Sanitation master plan for Lusaka, Zambia. Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation, 2012(13), 3266-3289. https://doi.org/10.2175/193864712811726969 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2175/193864712811726969

Chirgwin, H., Cairncross, S., Zehra, D., & Sharma Waddington, H. (2021). Interventions promoting uptake of water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) technologies in low‐ and middle‐income countries: An evidence and gap map of effectiveness studies. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 17(4), e1194. https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1194 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1194

Chowdry, S., & Kone, D. D. (2012). Business analysis of fecal sludge management: Emptying and transportation services in Africa and Asia. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

Cresswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Sage.

Dreibelbis, R., Winch, P. J., Leontsini, E., Hulland, K. R., Ram, P. K., Unicomb, L., & Luby, S. P. (2013). The integrated behavioural model for water, sanitation, and hygiene: A systematic review of behavioural models and a framework for designing and evaluating behaviour change interventions in infrastructure-restricted settings. BMC Public Health, 13, 1015. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-1015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-1015

Economic Commission for Africa. (2018). Pit-emptying practices in Lusaka: How to encourage households to use safer and more environmentally friendly services. https://www.eca-uk.com/2018/06/21/pit-emptying-practices-in-lusaka-how-to-encourage-households-to-use-safer-and-more-environmentally-friendly-services

Energy and Water Utilities Regulatory Authority. (2020). Guidelines for onsite sanitation and faecal sludge management for water and sanitation authorities. https://www.maji.go.tz/uploads/publications/sw1640157846-18.%20Guidelines%20for%20Onsite%20Sanitation%20and%20Faecal%20Sludge%20Management%20for%

Gerring, J. (2004). What is a case study and what is it good for? American Political Science Review, 98(2), 341-354. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055404001182 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055404001182

Greene, N., Hennessy, S., Rogers, T. W., & Tsai, J., De Los Reyes III, F. L. (2021). The role of emptying services in provision of safely managed sanitation: A classification and quantification of the needs of LMICs. Journal of Environmental Management, 290, 112612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112612 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112612

Government of the Republic of Zambia. (2022). National development plan. Ministry of Finance and National Planning. https://www.mofnp.gov.zm/?wpdmpro=8ndp-2022-2026

Haruna, S. (2023). A phonological study of consonants and vowels phonemic merger in Hausa. British Journal of Multidisciplinary and Advanced Studies, 4(3), 45-59. https://doi.org/10.37745/bjmas.2022.0196 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37745/bjmas.2022.0196

Holm, R. H., Kamangira, A., Tembo, M., Kasulo, V., Kandaya, H., Gijs Van Enk, P., & Velzeboer, A. (2018). Sanitation service delivery in smaller urban areas (Mzuzu and Karonga, Malawi). Environment and Urbanization, 30(2), 597-612. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247818766495 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247818766495

Jaiswal, J., Mehta, D., & Mehta, M. (2022). Impacts of scheduled desludging on quality of water and wastewater in Wai city, India. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 49(8), 2216-2229. https://doi.org/10.1177/23998083221078596 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/23998083221078596

Jenkins, M., Cumming, O., & Cairncross, S. (2015). Pit latrine emptying behavior and demand for sanitation services in Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 12(3), 2588-2611. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph120302588 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph120302588

Jonathan Parkinson, J. P., & Masudul Quader, M. Q. (2008). The challenge of servicing on-site sanitation in dense urban areas: Experiences from a pilot project in Dhaka. Waterlines, 27(2), 149-163. https://doi.org/10.3362/1756-3488.2008.017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3362/1756-3488.2008.017

Keeves, J. P. (Ed.). (1997). Educational research, methodology and measurement: An international handbook (2nd ed.). Pergamon.

Kennedy-Walker, R., Amezaga, J. M., & Paterson, C. A. (2015). The role of power, politics and history in achieving sanitation service provision in informal urban environments: A case study of Lusaka, Zambia. Environment and Urbanization, 27(2), 489-504. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247815583253 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247815583253

Kiger, M. E., & Varpio, L. (2020). Thematic analysis of qualitative data: AMEE Guide No. 131. Medical Teacher, 42(8), 846-854. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2020.1755030 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2020.1755030

Kivunja, C., & Kuyini, A. B. (2017). Understanding and applying research paradigms in educational contexts. International Journal of Higher Education, 6(5), 26-41. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v6n5p26 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v6n5p26

Kulabako, N. R., Nalubega, M., & Thunvik, R. (2007). Study of the impact of land use and hydrogeological settings on the shallow groundwater quality in a peri-urban area of Kampala, Uganda. Science of the Total Environment, 381(1-3), 180-199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2007.03.035 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2007.03.035

Lerebours, A., Scott, R., Sansom, K., & Kayaga, S. (2021). Regulating sanitation services in sub-Saharan Africa: An overview of the regulation of emptying and transport of faecal sludge in 20 cities and its implementation. Utilities Policy, 73, 101315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2021.101315 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2021.101315

Mawejje, M. N., et al. (2018). Piloting of a mobile faecal sludge transfer tank in 5 divisions of Kampala City. In Proceedings of the 41st WEDC International Conference: Transformation towards Sustainable and Resilient Wash Services, Nakuru, Kenya, July 2018 (pp. 9-13).

Mougoue, B., Ngnikam, E., Wanko, A., Feumba, R., & Noumba, I. (2012). Analysis of faecal sludge management in the cities of Douala and Yaoundé in Cameroon. Sustainable Sanitation Practice, 13.

Muxímpua, O., & Hawkins, P. (2012). Building blocks for effective faecal sludge management in peri-urban areas: The role of small-scale service providers in Maputo. In 2nd International Conference in Faecal Sludge Management (pp. 29-31). Durban, South Africa: WHO and UNICEF JMP. http://www.wssinfo.org/data-estimates/table/

National Water and Sanitation Council. (2018). Urban onsite sanitation and faecal sludge management framework for provision and regulation in Zambia. https://www.susana.org/_resources/documents/default/3-3327-7-1530187197.pdf

Opel, A., Bashar, M. K., & Ahmed, M. F. (2011). Landscape analysis and business model assessment in faecal sludge management: Extraction and transportation models in Bangladesh. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

Osborne, N., & Grant-Smith, D. (2021). In-depth interviewing. In S. Baum (Ed.), Methods in urban analysis (pp. 105-125). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-1677-8_7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-1677-8_7

Rao, K. C., Kvarnstrom, E., Di Mario, L., & Drechsel, P. (2016). Business models for fecal sludge management. International Water Management Institute (IWMI). https://doi.org/10.5337/2016.213 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5337/2016.213

Robinson, R. S. (2014). Purposive sampling. In A. C. Michalos (Ed.), Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research (pp. 5243-5245). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_2337 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_2337

Sauce, B., & Matzel, L. D. (2017). Inductive reasoning. In J. Vonk & T. Shackelford (Eds.), Encyclopedia of animal cognition and behavior (pp. 1-8). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47829-6_1045-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47829-6_1045-1

Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2009). Research methods for business students (5th ed.). Financial Times Prentice Hall.

Satterthwaite, D., & Mitlin, D. (2020). International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED). https://www.iied.org/

Scotland, J. (2012). Exploring the philosophical underpinnings of research: Relating ontology and epistemology to the methodology and methods of the scientific, interpretive, and critical research paradigms. English Language Teaching, 5(9), 9-16. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v5n9p9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v5n9p9

Seleman, A., Gabrielsson, S., Mbwette, T. S. A., & Kimwaga, R. (2020). Drivers of unhygienic desludging practices in unplanned settlements of Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Journal of Water, Sanitation and Hygiene for Development, 10(3), 512-526. https://doi.org/10.2166/washdev.2020.179 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2166/washdev.2020.179

SNV. (2024). Advancing sanitation governance in Zambia: A snapshot of the strengthened regulations for onsite sanitation and faecal sludge management. SNV. https://www.snv.org/assets/downloads/f/191310/x/477d30c695/2024-advancing-sanitation-governance-zm-snv.pdf

Simiyu, S., Swilling, M., & Cairncross, S. (2017). Decision-making on shared sanitation in the informal settlements of Kisumu, Kenya. International Journal of Environmental Health Research, 27, 377-393. https://doi.org/10.1080/09603123.2017.1350261 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09603123.2017.1350261

Strauss, M., Heinss, U., & Montangero, A. (2000). On-site sanitation: When the pits are full-Planning for resource protection in faecal sludge management. Schriftenr. Ver. Wasser. Boden. Lufthyg, 105, 353-360.

Strande, L., Ronteltap, M., & Brdjanovic, D. (2014). Faecal sludge management: Systems approach for implementation and operation. IWA Publishing. https://doi.org/10.2166/9781780404738 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2166/9781780404738

Suri, H. (2011). Purposeful sampling in qualitative research synthesis. Qualitative Research Journal, 11(2), 63-75. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ1102063 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ1102063

Thye, Y. P., Templeton, M. R., & Ali, M. (2011). A critical review of technologies for pit latrine emptying in developing countries. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 41, 1793-1819. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2010.481593 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2010.481593

Tomoi, H., Ingumba, B. B., Simiyu, S., Otteng, E., Osewe, J., Majiwa, H., Braun, L., Cumming, O., & Moriyasu, T. (2025). Barriers and enablers for group-based manual emptying services for onsite sanitation facilities in Nairobi, Kenya: A qualitative study. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health, 267, 114595. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheh.2025.114595

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheh.2025.114595

Tilley, E. (2024). Compendium of sanitation systems and technologies (2nd Rev. Ed.). The Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC). https://sswm.info/sites/default/files/reference_attachments/TILLEY%20et%20al%202014%20Compendium%20of%20Sanitation%20Systems%20and%20Technologies%202nd%20Revised%20Edition.pdf?form=MG0AV3

United Nations. (2019). United Nations world water development report 2019.

United Nations General Assembly. (2010). The human right to water and sanitation. [108th Plenary Meeting].

World Health Organization & United Nations Children's Fund. (2017). Annual report: WHO/UNICEF joint monitoring programme for water supply, sanitation and hygiene (JMP).

World Bank. (2015). Project appraisal document 1204: Proposed credit to the Republic of Zambia for a Lusaka sanitation project. Washington, D.C.

Wilkinson, L. A. (2011). Systems theory. In S. Goldstein & J. A. Naglieri (Eds.), Encyclopedia of child behavior and development (pp. 1466-1468). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-79061-9_941 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-79061-9_941

Yip, C., Han, N.-L., & Sng, B. (2016). Legal and ethical issues in research. Indian Journal of Anaesthesia, 60(9), 684-687. https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.190627 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.190627

ZAMSTAT. (2022). Zambia census of population and housing. Zambia Statistics Agency.